You’re planning that bucket-list trip across the Atlantic—or maybe debating a quick weekend getaway within Europe. But have you ever paused to ask yourself, “What is the carbon footprint of a long-haul flight?” Understanding the environmental cost of our travel choices isn’t about guilt; it’s about empowerment. When we know our impact in concrete numbers, we can make smarter, more sustainable decisions—whether that’s choosing a different mode of transport, offsetting our emissions, or simply flying less often.

In this post, we’ll dive into:

1. What is the carbon footprint of a long-haul flight?
2. Environmental impact of flying vs train travel
3. How much CO₂ does a short flight emit?
4. Ways to reduce your flight emissions
5. Sustainable aviation practices and greener airlines

By the end, you’ll have a clear picture of your sky-high emissions and actionable tips to shrink your travel footprint.

1. What Is the Carbon Footprint of a Long-Haul Flight?

A “long-haul” flight is typically defined as any journey over 3,700 km—for example, London to New York or Paris to Bangkok. Thanks to data from Atmosfair (a leading German NGO specializing in aviation emissions), we know that:

• Round-trip London ⇄ New York: ~986 kg CO₂ per passenger (The Guardian)
• One-way distance: ~5,550 km
• Per-kilometer average: roughly 0.18 kg CO₂/km (economy class)

To put that in perspective, 986 kg CO₂ is more than the average annual emissions of a person in over 50 countries worldwide—places where people generate less CO₂ each year than a single transatlantic flight. Those figures account only for CO₂; non-CO₂ effects (like contrails and nitrogen oxides) can increase total warming impact by an additional 20–50%.

2. Environmental Impact of Flying vs Train Travel

If you live in Europe, you’re fortunate to have a dense rail network. Trains typically emit far less CO₂ per passenger-kilometer:

• Eurostar (London⇄Paris): ~4 g CO₂/passenger-km
• Short-haul flight: ~154 g CO₂/passenger-km (Our World in Data)

That means the carbon footprint of taking the Eurostar is only about 3% of the equivalent short-haul flight (Our World in Data).

Example comparison:

• London → Paris (One-way, ~450 km)
  • Eurostar: 450 km × 4 g = 1.8 kg CO₂
  • Flight: 450 km × 154 g = 69.3 kg CO₂

Over dozens of trips, those kilograms add up—and the train wins every time on emissions. Plus, you skip airport lines, baggage fees, and often arrive downtown rather than miles outside the city.

3. How Much CO₂ Does a Short Flight Emit?

“Short-haul” flights are under 1,500 km (e.g., Berlin → Rome). Emissions for these routes vary by aircraft type and seating class, but averages look like this:

• Economy class: ~0.13 kg CO₂/km
• Business/First class: Up to ~0.80 kg CO₂/km (Sustainable Travel International)

Example: Berlin → Rome (~1,180 km)

• Economy: 1,180 km × 0.13 kg = 153.4 kg CO₂
• Business: 1,180 km × 0.80 kg = 944 kg CO₂

Even these “short” hops can rival the footprint of an entire person’s yearly emissions in some countries.

4. Ways to Reduce Your Flight Emissions

Ready to shrink that sky-high number? Here are practical strategies:

1. Fly Economy Whenever Possible
   First and business classes can emit up to 6× more CO₂ per seat due to extra space and amenities.
2. Choose Non-Stop Routes
   Every take-off and landing burns disproportionately more fuel. Direct flights minimize those high-intensity phases.
3. Pack Light
   Extra weight increases fuel burn. Aim for carry-on only—every 10 kg saved reduces emissions by ~0.3 kg CO₂/km.
4. Offset Responsibly
   Use reputable offset programs (Gold Standard, Plan Vivo, VCS). They fund vetted renewable-energy and reforestation projects.
5. Consider Alternative Modes
   When distances are under 1,000 km, trains or high-speed rail are often faster door-to-door and produce 90–95% fewer emissions.
6. Book on Fuel-Efficient Aircraft
   Newer models (Airbus A350, Boeing 787) are ~25% more fuel-efficient than older jets. Websites like SeatGuru often list plane types.
7. Travel Less, Stay Longer
   Fewer trips mean lower cumulative emissions—and longer stays let you enjoy deeper cultural experiences.

Last but not least

Flying offers connection, adventure, and opportunity—but it comes with a heavy environmental price tag. By understanding what is the carbon footprint of a long-haul flight (nearly 1 tonne CO₂ per passenger on London–New York round-trip The Guardian), weighing flying vs train travel, and embracing ways to reduce your flight emissions, you can travel more mindfully.

Your choices ripple outward: fewer flights, lighter luggage, smarter routes, and responsible offsets all add up.

—
Travel well, tread lightly.